text-to-cad — security grade SAFE, quality 63/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 63/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by earthtojake · Agent Tool · ★ 16.2k

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is text-to-cad safe to install? View the security audit →

About text-to-cad

████████╗███████╗██╗ ██╗████████╗██████╗ ██████╗ █████╗ ██████╗ ╚══██╔══╝██╔════╝╚██╗██╔╝╚══██╔══╝╚════██╗██╔════╝██╔══██╗██╔══██╗ ██║ █████╗ ╚███╔╝ ██║ █████╔╝██║ ███████║██║ ██║ ██║ ██╔══╝ ██╔██╗ ██║ ██╔═══╝ ██║ ██╔══██║██║ ██║ ██║ ███████╗██╔╝ ██╗ ██║ ███████╗╚██████╗██║ ██║██████╔╝ ╚═╝ ╚══════╝╚═╝ ╚═╝ ╚═╝ ╚══════╝ ╚═════╝╚═╝ ╚═╝╚═════╝ A library of agent skills for CAD, CAE and CAM Docs [![Python](https://

agentsai-agentscadmechanical-engineeringroboticsstepstlstptext-to-cad

Quick Facts

Stars16,236
Forks1,688
LanguagePython
CategoryAgent Tool
LicenseMIT
Quality Score63.2299031792207/100
Open Issues6
Last Updated2026-09-21
Created2026-04-22
Platformspython
Est. Tokens~15k

Compatible Skills

These tools work well together with text-to-cad for enhanced workflows:

  • cad-cae-copilot — semantic(0.72)+complementary+rare_topics+same_lang+shared_platform (79%)
  • agentcad — semantic(0.66)+complementary+rare_topics+same_lang+shared_platform (67%)
  • Autocad-MCP — semantic(0.51)+complementary+rare_topics+same_lang+shared_platform (67%)

text-to-cad alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a text-to-cad alternative? If you're comparing text-to-cad with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • ruflo by ruvnet · ⭐ 73.0k

    🌊 The original agent harness. Deploy intelligent multi-player swarms, coordinate autonomous workflows, and bu

  • mcp-agent by lastmile-ai · ⭐ 8.5k

    Build effective agents using Model Context Protocol and simple workflow patterns

  • klavis by Klavis-AI · ⭐ 5.8k

    Klavis AI: MCP integration platforms that let AI agents use tools reliably at any scale

  • solace-agent-mesh by SolaceLabs · ⭐ 4.9k

    An event-driven framework designed to build and orchestrate multi-agent AI systems. It enables seamless integr

  • aci by aipotheosis-labs · ⭐ 4.9k

    ACI.dev is the open source tool-calling platform that hooks up 600+ tools into any agentic IDE or custom AI ag

  • LocalAI by mudler · ⭐ 49.2k

    :robot: The free, Open Source alternative to OpenAI, Claude and others. Self-hosted and local-first. Drop-in r

More Agent Tool Tools

Explore other popular agent tool tools:

View all Agent Tool tools →

Popular Python Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is text-to-cad?

text-to-cad is A library of agent skills for CAD, CAE and CAM. It is categorized as a Agent Tool with 16.2k GitHub stars.

What programming language is text-to-cad written in?

text-to-cad is primarily written in Python. It covers topics such as agents, ai-agents, cad.

How do I install or use text-to-cad?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the text-to-cad GitHub repository at github.com/earthtojake/text-to-cad. The project has 16.2k stars and 1688 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does text-to-cad use?

text-to-cad is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to text-to-cad?

The top alternatives to text-to-cad on Agent Skills Hub include ruflo, mcp-agent, klavis. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Agent Tool tools