super-video-agent — security grade SAFE, quality 56/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 56/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by ww-w-ai · AI Tool · ★ 1

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is super-video-agent safe to install? View the security audit →

About super-video-agent

Give Claude Opus 5.5 a PDF, an essay or a topic and get a narrated short in your own voice. Every frame is drawn in code.

Quick Facts

Stars1
Forks1
LanguageJavaScript
CategoryAI Tool
LicenseApache-2.0
Quality Score55.912601136875/100
Last Updated2026-10-01
Created2026-09-27
Platformsclaude-code, node
Est. Tokens~20k

More AI Tool Tools

Explore other popular ai tool tools:

View all AI Tool tools →

Popular JavaScript Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is super-video-agent?

super-video-agent is Give Claude Opus 5.5 a PDF, an essay or a topic and get a narrated short in your own voice. Every frame is drawn in code.. It is categorized as a AI Tool with 1 GitHub stars.

What programming language is super-video-agent written in?

super-video-agent is primarily written in JavaScript.

How do I install or use super-video-agent?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the super-video-agent GitHub repository at github.com/ww-w-ai/super-video-agent. The project has 1 stars and 1 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does super-video-agent use?

super-video-agent is released under the Apache-2.0 license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse AI Tool tools